@@@@@ @   @ @@@@@    @     @ @@@@@@@   @       @  @@@@@ @@@@@ @@@
         @   @   @ @        @ @ @ @    @       @     @   @   @   @   @  @
         @   @@@@@ @@@@     @  @  @    @        @   @    @   @   @   @   @
         @   @   @ @        @     @    @         @ @     @   @   @   @  @
         @   @   @ @@@@@    @     @    @          @      @@@@@ @@@@@ @@@

                        Mt. Holz Science Fiction Society
                    Club Notice - 02/23/01 -- Vol. 19, No. 34

       Chair/Librarian: Mark Leeper, 732-817-5619, mleeper@avaya.com
       Factotum: Evelyn Leeper, 732-332-6218, eleeper@lucent.com
       Distinguished Heinlein Apologist: Rob Mitchell, robmitchell@avaya.com
       HO Chair Emeritus: John Jetzt, jetzt@avaya.com
       HO Librarian Emeritus: Nick Sauer, njs@lucent.com
       Back issues at http://www.geocities.com/evelynleeper
       All material copyright by author unless otherwise noted.

       The Science Fiction Association of Bergen County meets on the
       second Saturday of every month in Upper Saddle River; call
       201-447-3652 for details.  The Denver Area Science Fiction
       Association meets 7:30 PM on the third Saturday of every month at
       Southwest State Bank, 1380 S. Federal Blvd.

       ===================================================================

       1. Last week I was being prepared for a sleep study.  I had brought
       to  the  hospital  my  pillow, a Walkman, a book, and lots of other
       good things in my overstuffed suitcase.  A technician I  will  call
       Sandy  was  about to start gluing electrical leads to my head.  The
       story picks up from there.

       Sandy then started attaching the leads to my head  using  glue  and
       something  called  "collodion."   In the morning all the glue would
       wash out with warm water or nail polish remover.  I  wonder  if  we
       have  any  nail  polish  remover?   I  had  heard  of  collodion as
       something that film makeup men use to attach monster makeup.  As  I
       sat  there  and  she  administered  electrode  I  could  smell  the
       adhesives in fumes going up my nose.  The process  took  about  ten
       minutes.   Boris  Karloff would literally go through a process like
       this for eight hours before shooting could start for  some  of  his
       better  makeup like THE MUMMY.  After ten minutes I had had my fill
       of it.  That is what Boris got paid for.

       I was taken back to my room with Sandy holding up my "pony tail" of
       wires.   I  was  installed  in the bed and shown how to use the TV.
       This happened about 10 PM and I was told that 11 PM it was  "lights
       out."   Walkman,  book, pillow?  They all stayed in my suitcase.  I
       used their cushion rather than my pillow.  The lights were actually
       out  already so I would not be able read, I would just turn off the
       TV at 11 PM.

       At home I watch almost no commercial TV so had no idea what was on.
       I  settled  for  a program called "Gideon's Crossing."  Actually, I
       was rather pleased with the choice.  Years ago I read some  of  the
       books  by  Berton Roueche, collections of articles he wrote for the
       New Yorker.  These were true stories  of  medical  detection.   The
       sort  of  thing  was that one day eleven different men checked into
       the same hospital, all of them with faces turning  blue.   Whatever
       was  causing  the  problem,  it had to be stopped before it claimed
       more people.  But how to you find out the who,  what,  why,  where,
       and  when  of something like this when you have only the victims as
       your clues?  "Gideon's Crossing" had the same sort of story.   Nine
       people in the hospital were struck with sepsis.  The characters had
       to figure out what was causing it and stop  it.   It  was  actually
       quite  interesting.   The  only  thing:  I  was  watching  it  in a
       hospital.  It was sort of like seeing THE HIGH AND THE MIGHTY on an
       airline flight.

       At 11 PM it was TV off.  Then the wait for sleep.  I could not move
       around  much  because  of  the wires connected to me.  I waited and
       waited.  Maybe I dozed off a little, but not very much.  I think  I
       looked  at my watch about midnight.  Maybe again about 12:30 AM.  I
       must have actually fallen asleep about 1 AM.  At 2 AM there  was  a
       knock  at  the  door.   Time for the CPAP.  This would be no Emmett
       Kelly nose.  It was more like a World War II bomber pilot air mask.
       It  fit  over most of my head with straps and had an inch-wide hose
       to my nose.  I was supposed to breathe though my nose  and  not  my
       mouth.  This was hard because I generally breathe through my mouth.
       It helped a little that my lips were now dry and a little sticky so
       I  could  let them just seal.  I became aware of every breath.  The
       CPAP amplifies the sound of each breath for the user.  In addition,
       the  forced  air  burns  the inside of the nose a little.  Again it
       took a while to get to sleep.  But I must have since another  knock
       at the door came at about 4:30 AM.  The study was over.

       I asked what the results were and was told just that the  CPAP  cut
       down on my snoring.  Of course, it kept me awake and that by itself
       would have cut down on my  snoring.   It  took  about  another  ten
       minutes  to  take  the  wires  off  my face and to get the glue and
       collodion out of my hair.  The nail polish remover  did  not  smell
       very good and again the fumes went up my nose.  And that was pretty
       much it.  I got dressed and Sandy told me how to get back  outside.
       I  left the hospital about 5 AM.  It was still very dark out in the
       middle of winter, but the fog had disappeared during the night.   I
       drove  home,  surprised  to  see  as many cars on the road as there
       were.  At home I left my suitcase in  the  den  and  went  to  bed,
       though I would not sleep until that night.  [-mrl]

       ===================================================================
       2. CHOCOLAT (a film review by Mark R. Leeper):

                 Capsule: To  a  straight-laced  French  village
                 comes  a woman with the message that life is to
                 be enjoyed and not simply endured.   The  woman
                 opens  a chocolate shop and sows the seeds of a
                 belief in human potential laced with  a  little
                 self-indulgence.    With   five  Academy  Award
                 nominations, this American film set  in  France
                 is more a parable than a realistic story and it
                 is a theme that director  Lasse  Hallstrom  has
                 visited  before.   But the film is itself, like
                 the chocolates it shows, a pleasure.  Rating: 7
                 (0 to 10), low +2 (-4 to +4)

       Lasse Hallstrom's new film is a parable about believing in  oneself
       and even more on getting a little joy from life.  It is a contrived
       story in which the good guys are a little too good and the bad guys
       are  obvious.   But  its  message  is  disarming and sweetened with
       tempting visions of chocolate that seduce the viewer.   But  it  is
       getting a following in a time when so many of the popular films are
       pushing nihilism and showing violence.

       In a little French village life is painted like the village  itself
       in  tones  of  brown  and gray.  Everyone knows his place and knows
       exactly  what  is  expected  of  him.   Those  who   forget   their
       responsibilities  are  quickly  reminded.  Pleasure is for the most
       part to be deferred for the next life.  Instead life is  piety  and
       submission.   But  in  1959,  as  Lent is approaching, a mysterious
       woman Vianne (Juliette Binoche) arrives in town with  her  daughter
       and  in the shadow of the church at the beginning of Lent sets up a
       chocolate shop.  Vianne is immediately countered by the  forces  of
       convention  and  of  self-denial.   These forces are marshalled and
       lead by the town's mayor the Comte de  Reynard  (fine  comic  actor
       Alfred  Molina).   Slyly Reynard affirms his number-one position by
       turning the townspeople  against  Vianne  and  the  change  she  is
       bringing.  He and Vianne are poles apart and the little French town
       is figuratively and nearly literally not big enough for the two  of
       them.

       At the same time some who are lower in the town's pecking order are
       giving  in  to the temptations of self-indulgence and even breaking
       from their established places.  The respectable people of the  town
       side  with  the  mayor, but the marginal people, those who normally
       get swept aside, become friends with Vianne and find they enjoy her
       sweet  chocolate and her easy friendship.  For those in the middle,
       between the mayor and Vianne, there is the constant  temptation  of
       all  that  chocolate.   One  of  the  women who joins the circle of
       friends is Josephine Muscat (Lina Olin) whose brutish husband Serge
       (Peter  Stormare,  who  played  the quiet killer in FARGO) owns the
       local saloon and beats Josephine when  he  is  drunk.   Another  of
       Vianne's  circle  is  an  old  woman,  Armande Voizin (Judi Dench),
       nearly disowned by her family.

       While CHOCOLAT is not ultimately negative on religion, the alliance
       between  the  young priest and the mayor is looked on as one of the
       negative forces in the town.  Too often the local  priest  takes  a
       cold and unfriendly stance.  The pleasures of chocolate are said to
       be evil.  A dog, we are told, has no soul.  But the rules  of  Lent
       still  apply  to the dog.  The historic town hero is remembered for
       having turned out the Huguenots.  In the end the film is  a  little
       pat,  even  for  the  parable  that  it is.  The ending is a little
       contrived and not quite believable.

       There seem to be two major themes in the  photography  (at  least).
       One  is  the  color in the town.  It is drab grays and browns until
       Vianne arrives in her bright red cloak and hood.  Echoing ideas  of
       PLEASANTVILLE, though in a more subtle fashion, Vianne brings color
       to the village.  Her shop is bright with color, while the  rest  of
       the  town  is muted in color.  Vianne has the courage to break from
       the dismal color scheme and bring some life to  the  village.   The
       other  theme  is tempting the audience with luscious photography of
       chocolate.  Like BABETTE'S FEAST and LIKE WATER FOR CHOCOLATE, this
       is a film that seduces the viewer with its photography of food.

       CHOCOLAT is generating some controversy; it  seems  to  be  a  film
       people  either love or hate.  For my part I rate it a 7 on the 0 to
       10 scale and a low +2 on the -4 to +4 scale.  [-mrl]

                                          Mark Leeper
                                          HO 1K-644 732-817-5619
                                          mleeper@avaya.com

           They call a movie 'art house' until they find out that 	   people like it, in which case it's mainstream.
                                          -- David Mamet